
A historian argues that King Verica, the Iron Age ruler of the Atrebates, was a woman, which changes how the Roman invasion of Britain is understood.
Verica ruled the Atrebates in southern Britain as a client king of Rome. According to the Roman historian Cassius Dio, Verica's exile around 40 CE gave Emperor Claudius a pretext to invade Britain, starting a campaign that led to Roman conquest. Archaeologist Miles Russell of Bournemouth University, in the book Caratacus: Great King of Britain, contends that Dio's account rests on a mistaken assumption that Verica was male.
Russell cites several clues. The name Verica ends in "a," as do other names of clearly female figures of the period, including Boudica. The coins bearing Verica's name use the Latin title rex, which Russell says was gender-neutral and showed the emperor's approval. The letters "COMF" on the coins could mean "daughter of Commios" rather than "son of Commios," and the coin fronts show a bare-breasted woman.
If Verica was a woman, Russell argues, the story fits Dio's portrayal of Claudius as an easily swayed leader. Russell says Dio implied the invasion was driven by a "barbarian femme fatale," while the invasion was in fact Claudius's chance to prove himself a military leader.
The argument shows how assumptions about gender in 19th-century scholarship may have shaped the historical record of Rome's conquest of Britain.
source covering this story
1 independent source
Only Nautilus is covering this story.